This week the NSW State Parliament is set to debate independent MP Clover Moore's Residential Tenancies Amendment (Occupancy Agreements) Bill, which would set out broad occupancy principles for all marginal renters not otherwise covered by residential tenancies legislation. The occupancy principles would deal with important matters such as evictions, repairs, bonds, utility charges and penalty terms; and these principles would be given effect in individual occupancy agreements. Disputes would be resolved by the Tribunal, where parties would have access to a wide range of remedies.
Moore's Bill was drafted late last year; now the Government has its own draft Boarding Houses Bill, which would establish a Boarding Houses Register, revamp the licensing regime
for licensed boarding houses for people with disability ('residential
centers for vulnerable persons')... and set out broad occupancy principles for some – not all – marginal renters (just those living in 'registrable boarding houses'). These occupancy
principles would deal with important matters such as evictions, repairs – but not bonds, utility charges
and penalty terms; and these principles would not necessarily be given effect in
individual occupancy agreements. Disputes would be resolved by the Tribunal, but remedies would be limited – there's no provision in the draft Bill for compensation.
The Parliament – and the people of New South Wales – can and should have the best of both Bills.
The Government should, as we've submitted, amend the draft Boarding Houses Bill – and in particular, amend Chapter 3, which contains all the draft Bill's provisions about occupancy principles.
First, it should provide that Chapter 3 – and only Chapter 3 – applies to all the persons to whom Moore's Bill would apply.
Secondly, it should include in the occupancy principles all of the additional occupancy principles – those about bonds, utilities and penalty terms – from Moore's Bill.
And thirdly, it should make the occupancy principles as effective as those in Moore's Bill, by requiring that they are given effect in individual occupancy agreements and that the usual contractual remedies – including compensation for loss – are available.
Then we'd have a Boarding Houses Register, a revamped licensing regime for licensed boarding houses, and fair, effective occupancy agreements for all marginal renters.
Oh, that's what law reform dreams are made of.
Monday, August 20, 2012
1 comment:
Please keep your comments PC - that is, polite and civilised. Comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog administrator; no correspondence will be entered into. Comments that are abusive of individual persons, or are sexist, racist or otherwise offensive will be removed, so don’t bother leaving them.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Bill Hagar AND Bill Lee Roth in the one pic! Who'd've thunk it :)
ReplyDelete