Like Stewart to Stewart, Mason to Foran, or Cherry-Evans to
the Gold Coast (and back again), we were hit with a Northern Beaches 1-2 this
week.
Try time
Ever the pugilist, the Prime Minister and Member for
Warringah did the grunt work early. Way back in 2014, the first Abbott-Hockey
budget downsized projected spending on health and education over the next
decade, pushing $80 billion dollars of ‘cuts’ or ‘efficiency measures,’ depending
on how you feel about that sort of thing.
His offload to NSW Premier, Member for Manly, and Liberal
Party teammate Mike Baird was a while in the making. But arrive it did – the unstoppable force
calling on us to save the health system by upping the GST from 10 to 15 per
cent in a barnstorming Monday address.
Given Australia’s steadily low
GST, it is perhaps no surprise that the debate around increasing our tax on
consumption has been around for nearly as long as the tax itself. Most
relevantly for our purposes, the No Land Tax party called for precisely the
same rise before the recent state election, in a flurry of yellow bibs and clip
art testimonials.
But both the Premier and No Land Tax pitch GST reform in
artificially narrow terms – the one true path to health system deliverance, and
to shifting fiscal responsibility away from landowners, respectively.
And, of course, as a regressive tax, low-income renters would
feel the pinch of an increased GST more than most – even if it remains unclear precisely
where the hypothetical compensation for this hypothetical rise would leave this
vulnerable group.
This state would benefit from a broader discussion about tax
reform than the one currently enveloping the GST alone. In particular, the
Tenants’ Union is an established proponent of a broad-based tax, applying to
all land in New South Wales, as a boon for renters and owners alike:
“Land tax is an important source of NSW State Government revenue. Land tax also has the potential to improve housing affordability for purchasers and renters, and economic activity generally. Our present system of land tax does not realise this potential, and should be reformed.”
There is no single path in tax reform - the PM and Premier’s
fancy footwork in pushing the line notwithstanding. And we say land tax reform
should play a prominent part in a much-expanded conversation.
Read more about the
Tenants’ Union’s land tax reform position here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep your comments PC - that is, polite and civilised. Comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog administrator; no correspondence will be entered into. Comments that are abusive of individual persons, or are sexist, racist or otherwise offensive will be removed, so don’t bother leaving them.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.