Strike notices are an important component of the new laws
Many of the new rules are highly complex. So The Tenants' Union has put together a guide to the five most important changes for tenants, community advocates, support persons - just about anyone who is not a lawyer - and reproduced it in full here. Any tenants contacted by their housing provider regarding the new laws should also contact their local Tenants' Advice and Advocacy Service for assistance as soon as possible.
1. Strike notices
Social housing landlords can use a system of three ‘strike’
notices. These are letters issued by the landlord to the tenant when the
landlord believes the tenant has breached the tenancy agreement, but the breach
is not serious enough to terminate the agreement.
A strike notice is only an allegation against the tenant.
But if a tenant has received two notices in a 12-month period, the landlord may
seek termination of the tenancy from the Tribunal instead of issuing a third
strike.
FACS Housing’s policy is to issue strike notices against
tenants for alleged antisocial behaviour (for example, hosting a loud party where
bottles were thrown onto the street). But the new law allows social housing
landlords to issue strike notices for any alleged breach.
Allegation letter
FACS Housing’s policy is to first send the tenant a letter
concerning the alleged breach. This letter describes the alleged conduct and
provides the date it is said to have occurred. It invites the tenant to attend
an interview to discuss the allegation. The tenant should attend this
interview, or immediately contact FACS Housing if they are unable to attend at
the nominated time. A tenant should take an advocate or support person to the
interview.
The law does not require landlords to send an allegation
letter, and community housing providers may choose not to.
Warning notice
If FACS Housing decides that the tenant has committed the
breach, and the tenant has not received a strike notice in the previous 12
months, it will issue the tenant with a warning. This does not count as one of
the strikes required to seek termination of the tenancy at the Tribunal.
The law does not require landlords to issue a warning
notice, and community housing providers may choose not to.
Strike notice
If the landlord decides a tenant has committed a breach -
and in the case of a FACS Housing tenancy, the tenant has already received a
warning notice in the last 12 months – it may issue the tenant with a strike
notice.
The letter must describe the conduct, provide the date it is
said to have occurred, and explain why the landlord thinks this was a breach of
the tenancy agreement. It must also allow the tenant to write to the landlord
to dispute the strike notice and ask that it be withdrawn. Disputing a strike
in this way is useful in any later termination proceedings (see 'Termination for three strikes').
Review of a strike
notice
If a tenant has written to the landlord to dispute a strike
notice, and the landlord has decided not to withdraw it, the tenant may ask for
the strike to be reviewed by a separate panel. The landlord must allow the
tenant at least 21 days from its decision not to withdraw the strike to ask for
a review. The review panel can confirm a strike or require the landlord to
withdraw it.
FACS Housing uses the Housing Appeals Committee as its
review panel. Community housing providers are expected to do the same.
Termination for three
strikes
If tenant has received two strike notices in the previous 12
months, the landlord may issue a notice of termination to the tenant instead of
a third strike. This allows the landlord to apply to the Tribunal for orders terminating
the tenancy for the three alleged breaches.
The Tribunal may not be able to consider all the evidence regarding
strikes one and two when deciding whether to order termination. If the tenant
did not write to the landlord to dispute strikes one and two, the Tribunal may
be forced to accept that the breaches occurred.
2. Neighbourhood
impact statements
Social housing landlords can provide a 'neighbourhood impact statement'
to the Tribunal when seeking termination of a tenancy for breach of an obligation
under the tenancy agreement. This is a summary of statements
made by the tenant’s neighbours about the effect the tenancy has had on them.
The Tribunal must consider the contents of a statement when deciding whether to
order termination, but does not have to agree with it.
A statement can only be provided after the Tribunal has
found that a breach occurred. It cannot be provided as evidence of the breach.
Contributing to a
statement
Neighbours asked to contribute to a neighbourhood impact
statement should be aware that the statement, and the Tribunal proceedings it
is used in, may identify them as participants. Although the law requires the
landlord and Tribunal to make efforts not to identify participants, it does not
guarantee anonymity.
3. Mandatory termination
When a social housing landlord applies to terminate a tenancy for some
types of illegal use of the property, damage to the property, and injury to a
neighbour or landlord's representative, the Tribunal is now required to order
termination of the tenancy if it finds that the conduct occurred.
There are limited exceptions for especially vulnerable tenants, and
tenants with children who would face hardship if evicted.
These changes are highly complex. The consequences for
affected tenants will vary greatly depending on the alleged conduct and the circumstances
of the tenant and other residents.
4. Repairs
certificates
Social housing landlords can provide the Tribunal with a
certificate of costs, when seeking reimbursement for repairs to damage to the
property that the tenant caused (or allowed others to cause). The Tribunal must
accept the certificate as proof of the reasonable cost of the repairs.
Previously, a tenant could accept responsibility for
damaging their property, but argue that the landlord’s costs were unreasonably
high.
5. Landlord
repossession
When the Tribunal orders termination of a tenancy, it must
order that the landlord is to take back possession of the property in 28 days
or less (unless ‘exceptional circumstances’ apply). Previously, the Tribunal
could order repossession at a later date.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep your comments PC - that is, polite and civilised. Comments may be removed at the discretion of the blog administrator; no correspondence will be entered into. Comments that are abusive of individual persons, or are sexist, racist or otherwise offensive will be removed, so don’t bother leaving them.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.